SCAMTRIX · INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION · EST. MMXXVI · EVIDENCE BEFORE VERDICT ·ScamTrixEvidence before verdict

How we work

The 13-point investigation protocol

Every case file runs the same thirteen checks, in order, before a verdict is printed. No site is convicted on vibes; no site is cleared on charm.

  1. 01

    Domain age via RDAP/WHOIS

    We pull the registration record directly. A 'trusted exchange since 2018' registered eleven weeks ago is not a discrepancy — it is the story.

  2. 02

    SSL certificate validity

    We verify the certificate chain, issuer and expiry. A padlock proves encryption, not honesty — but a broken or self-signed chain on a 'bank-grade' platform tells its own tale.

  3. 03

    DNS records

    MX, NS, A and TXT records reveal the real infrastructure: where mail actually goes, which name servers host the operation, and what else lives on the same address.

  4. 04

    Blacklist status

    We check major security and anti-phishing blocklists. Prior listings are logged with dates; a clean record is noted, not assumed.

  5. 05

    Company registration

    Every claimed corporate entity is checked against the official register of the jurisdiction it claims. 'Incorporated in St. Vincent' is verified, not transcribed.

  6. 06

    On-site claims audit

    Guaranteed returns, fake team photos, invented awards, regulator logos. Each claim on the site is catalogued and tested against verifiable fact.

  7. 07

    Contact and address verification

    We test the phone numbers, email addresses and physical addresses the site publishes. Virtual offices and disconnected lines are recorded as findings.

  8. 08

    Payment-method analysis

    How a platform takes money tells you who it is. Crypto-only deposits, pressure toward irreversible transfers and evasive withdrawal rails all carry weight.

  9. 09

    Withdrawal-complaint scan

    We scan public complaint channels for the signature pattern: deposits instant, withdrawals 'pending review'. Volume and consistency of complaints are logged.

  10. 10

    Review-network scan

    Five-star reviews posted in bursts by accounts with no history are themselves evidence. We map the review ecosystem around the site, including astroturfing patterns.

  11. 11

    Linked-domain analysis

    Scam operations rarely run one site. Shared analytics IDs, cloned templates, common name servers and redirect chains expose the wider network.

  12. 12

    Screenshot evidence archive

    Every page we cite is captured and archived at review time, so the record stands even after the site edits itself — or disappears.

  13. 13

    Regulatory-register cross-check

    Claims of licensing are checked against the actual registers of financial regulators — SEC, FCA, ASIC, CySEC and their peers. A license number that belongs to someone else ends the discussion.

The protocol ends in a verdict — scam, highly suspicious, caution or verified — and a trust score from 0 to 100. Both are editorial judgments, and both carry the evidence they rest on. If new facts emerge, the case file is updated openly through our corrections process.